Excerpts
from
"Mental
Health Education and Social Control"
By
Dr.
Dennis Laurence Cuddy,
© 2005 - All Rights Reserved
As indicated before, the one-world government
will be Socialist, having been brought about by a Hegelian
synthesis of Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism, linking
regional economic arrangements such as NAFTA, the European Union
and others.
We are supposed to be a government of, by, and for the people.
However, we are not actually in control of our lives, but rather
a power elite constitutes an invisible government which really
controls us and will plan the direction of our society. If you
doubt this, on April 19, 1906 President Theodore Roosevelt
revealed: "Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an
invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no
responsibility to the people."
Because we are to be a "planned society," a major part of the
power elite's plan involves what to do about the sharp increase
in the proportion of elderly in the U.S. This is one possible
reason "death education" has been promoted over the past few
decades in our schools. In 1975 author Erica Carle wrote of her
concern that "the influence of the Education Commission of the
States will force the teaching of DEATH EDUCATION in our
schools. DEATH EDUCATION (Thanatology) was one of the main
subjects covered at a convention of the newly-formed Wisconsin
Secondary School Psychology Teachers which was held on October
30, 1975....The Euthanasia Education Council... Planned
Parenthood, and many, many more are cooperating.
Your sons and
daughters do not have to be happy, carefree, well balanced and
mentally sound any longer. Their minds can be controlled,
corrupted and emotionalized by being forced to dwell on suicide,
euthanasia, abortion, mercy killing, cancer, leukemia, murder,
grief, bereavement, old age, fear, funerals, and capital
punishment. The attitudes of students on any related subject can
be thoroughly probed and recorded in the computer records....
-
The
following are questions from the questionnaire we received at
the convention: ...
-
To what extent do you believe in life after
death?
-
To what extent do you believe in reincarnation?
-
How often
do you think about your own death?
-
If you could choose, when
would you die? (Note: Will this choice be recorded and used as
permission to cause death at a later date?)
-
For whom or what
might you be willing to kill another person?
-
How often have you
seriously contemplated committing suicide?"
About a week later,
the MILWAUKEE COUNTY NEWS (November 6, 1975) reported that one
student slipped into a coma and died after death education in
her junior high class. Doctors were unable to help her condition
! They were baffled by her complete lack of will to live or even
to attempt to live.
One reason for all of this focus being placed upon death has
been to condition the populace to accept euthanasia. In Robert
Hugh Benson's LORD OF THE WORLD, which was written in 1907, he
said that by the late 1990s there would be Ministers of
Euthanasia (like Dr. Jack Kevorkian). Benson also said the
Communist movement would come to the fore in 1917 (the exact
year of the Russian Revolution), and that the final scheme of
Western Free Trade would occur in 1989.
Benson's father, Edward White Benson, founded the
Cambridge
Ghost Society in 1851
(with members such as B. F. Westcott and
Fenton John Antony Hort) before becoming the Archbishop of
Canterbury. The Ghost Society was the forerunner of the
Society
for Psychical Research (SPR), co-founded in 1882 by Henry Sidgwick, who tutored Bertrand Russell
and whose sister Mary
married Edward White Benson. And Henry Sidgwick married Eleanor
Balfour, sister of Arthur Balfour who became president of the SPR, as did William James, the
father of American psychology
(Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung would become Corresponding Members
of the SPR --- see letter here from Jung to H.G. Wells about the
latter's book THE OPEN CONSPIRACY).
Arthur Balfour's brother
Gerald (also a president of the SPR) was Emily Lytton Lutyens'
brother-in-law, and she was the granddaughter of occultist and
alchemist Lord Edward Bulwer-Lytton and a disciple of
theosophist Annie Besant (who wore a swastika pendant and
co-edited LUCIFER magazine with Madame Helena Petrovna Blavatsky,
the founder of the Theosophical Society). Lutyens was also
foster-mother of Jiddu Krishnamurti, who was promoted by Annie
Besant as Lord Maitreya (supposedly "the Christ" of the New
Age).
According to Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University,
Prof. Carroll Quigley in THE ANGLO-AMERICAN ESTABLISHMENT, the SPR was "one of the enduring creations of the Cecil Bloc," which
was headed by British Prime Minister Sir Robert Gascoyne-Cecil
(Lord Salisbury) and which included many of the power elite from
which Cecil Rhodes formed his
secret
"Society of the Elect" to
"take the government of the whole world," in Rhodes' own words.
Rhodes' mentor,
John Ruskin, was a member of the SPR and
has a swastika on his gravestone. Members of the American SPR included
author Mark Twain, attorney
Clarence Darrow, the "father of progressive
education" John Dewey,
and environmentalist Gifford
Pinchot (Skull & Bones member) who was a vice-president of the
First International Congress of Eugenics
in 1912 along with
Winston Churchill, Alexander Graham Bell, and Harvard University
president (1869-1909) Charles Eliot.
Former British Prime
Minister
William Gladstone was a member of the SPR, and Arthur
Balfour in 1902 became British Prime Minister after Lord
Salisbury, who was the brother of Arthur and Gerald Balfour's
mother. Could it be that Robert Hugh Benson's amazingly accurate
forecasts in LORD OF THE WORLD in 1907 were actually a result of
his hearing the plans of these powerful people when he was a
boy?
How will the planned global society come about in the future? It
might happen something like this. In the past, U.S. policy has
been to support Third World dictators with whom we made deals.
If there was a democratically elected government that did not
obey the will of certain American transnational corporations, it
was toppled (e.g., Iran in the early 1950s when they
nationalized their oil and the CIA had them overthrown).
Now,
however, the policy is to put in place democratically elected
rulers beholden to the U.S. (e.g., Hamid Karzai in Afghanistan)
and who will make deals (Karzai was a UNOCAL consultant and
pipeline deals have been made). A number of American
transnational corporations (e.g., Bechtel, Halliburton, etc.)
are happy with this arrangement, but there is a realization that
democratically elected governments eventually tend to become
nationalistic. The power elite intends to control that by
economically entangling the foreign governments in the World
Trade Organization and by getting them in debt, so that it will
be economic suicide for them not to submit "voluntarily" to the
power elite's will.
The people of America and the world will be told that what is
occurring is a positive movement toward global integration.
Regarding the Clinton Global Initiative conference in New York
City on September 22-24, 2005, former President Clinton wrote a
letter concerning "the challenges of global interdependence" and
said: "I am excited about this opportunity to work with you in
an effort to move the world from an unstable interdependence
toward an integrated global economy of shared responsibilities,
shared opportunities and shared values in the years to come."
The power elite will use networks of like-minded globalists to
further its aims. These include Bill Clinton and his network of
Rhodes Scholars, as well as the Bush family and its Skull &
Bones network along with members of other Yale University secret
societies.
Do you really think President Bush's recent
appointments of Yale's Psi Upsilon (founded as a secret society
in the 1830s) members John Negroponte to head the Department of
Homeland Security and Porter Goss to head the CIA were
coincidences? Another Psi Upsilon member (and in the same year's
membership photo as Negroponte and Goss) is President Bush's
uncle William H. T. Bush, who has made a lot of money from the
Iraq war.
The press/media will also be used by the power elite in
selecting what information the public receives and doesn't
receive. Remember that in the late 1940s, the CIA under
Operation Mockingbird began infiltrating the press.
Food will even be a weapon used by the power elite to control
the population of the world. In fact, it has already been used
as a weapon. On December 10, 1974 the National Security
Council's NSSM 200, "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth
for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," is marked
"classified" and "confidential." It was proposed by Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger and was given final approval by National
Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft.
The document stated that "if
future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is
urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made
effective in the 1970s and 1980s....(Financial) assistance will
be given to other countries, considering such factors as
population growth....Food and agricultural assistance is vital
for any population sensitive development strategy....Allocation
of scarce resources should take account of what steps a country
is taking in population control....There is an alternative view
that mandatory programs may be needed...."
Although the power elite will resort to mandatory measures if
necessary, they prefer creating situations in which the public
believes it is voluntarily accepting something. For example,
concerning mental health screening, insurance companies may say
your insurance premiums will increase if you are not screened.
Therefore,
people "voluntarily" will submit to
mental health
screenings to prevent an increase in payments. In addition,
there are current discussions about future means-testing for
Social Security, and whether one has had a mental health
screening could also be added as a criteria for level of Social
Security payments to individuals.
The only thing that might threaten the power elite's plan will
be religious (e.g., Christian, Islamic, Jewish, etc.)
fundamentalists, who are already being branded as "extremists"
who are "intolerant" of others. This is designed to discredit
and marginalize them. And if necessary, they will be branded as
"mentally ill."
In THE CASE AGAINST RELIGION: A
PSYCHOTHERAPIST'S VIEW (1968), sexologist Albert Ellis (1971
Humanist of the Year) proclaimed that
"Religion is...directly
opposed to the goals of mental health....It encourages a
fanatic, obsessive-compulsive kind of commitment that is, in its
own right, a form of mental illness....This close connection
between mental illness and religion is inevitable and
invariant....In the final analysis, then, religion is neurosis."
There has been support in the media for this attitude as well.
Recently, Bill Maher, host of HBO's "Real Time With Bill Maher,"
said on MSNBC's "Scarborough Country" that "Religion stops
people from thinking. I think it justifies crazies....I think
religion is a neurological disorder." You may say this was just
the ranting of one man, but the point is that he wasn't fired
for saying this! Don Wildmon, chairman of the American Family
Association, explained: "Had Maher said such things about
homosexuals, he would have been immediately fired. But because
he was speaking of Christians, his bigotry was acceptable to
HBO, owned by Time-Warner, Inc." (www.afa.net/hbobillmaher.asp)
Social control also will be exercised via education. In the late
1960s, the Wisconsin Social Studies Curriculum Committee
produced KNOWLEDGE PROCESSES AND VALUES IN THE NEW SOCIAL
STUDIES (Bulletin No. 185, 1968-70), in which one could read:
"A
child generally comes to school with what R.J. Havighurst calls
an authoritarian conscience acquired from his parents through a
progression of punishments and rewards. He soon learns that he
is not equipped to deal with all the new situations which
confront him. Peers and teachers join and sometimes supplant
parents in helping him to find solutions which are often in
conflict with those offered by his parents. His task, then, is
to change from this early authoritarian conscience to a rational
one."
A couple of years later, Solveig Eggerz wrote "Psychiatry in the
Classroom," which was published in the May 1972 edition of
PRIVATE PRACTICE, THE JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC MEDICINE
(published by the Congress of County Medical Societies). In this
article, she related that Health, Education and Welfare
Secretary Elliot Richardson told a National Education
Association (NEA) convention:
"It may very well be that the
teachers are potentially our largest cadre of mental health
personnel." She then informed the reader that Robert F. Peck and
James V. Mitchell stated in an NEA booklet that "the school has
a major stake in repairing damaged mental health and in
enhancing good mental health."
And she explained that Peck and
Mitchell advocated that the teacher practice extensive mental
health measurement in the classroom.
This all fit neatly with the NEA's forecast, as its publication
TODAY'S EDUCATION in its January 1969 edition published Harold
and June Shane's "Forecast for the '70s," a digest of many
articles, in which one finds the following comments:
"Ten years
hence it should be more accurate to term him (the teacher) a
'learning clinician.' This title is intended to convey the idea
that schools are becoming 'clinics' whose purpose is to provide
individualized psychosocial 'treatment' for the student, thus
increasing his value both to himself and to society....(Children
would) become the objects of (biochemical) experimentation."
In the late 1960s, the NEA also had promoted "sensitivity
training," which was characterized in its 1962 publication
ISSUES IN (HUMAN RELATIONS) TRAINING as fitting into "a context
of institutional influence procedures which includes coercive
persuasion in the form of thought reform or brainwashing."
According to Solveig Eggerz in her article mentioned above, Paul
Hummel, an associate professor at the University of Hawaii, said
that the deeper forms of sensitivity training
"can have such
traumatic effects as to cause complete mental breakdown in
individuals. In many cases the loyalties of persons have changed
completely. School children lose all respect for their parents,
church and country. They gain a group dependency and are willing
to follow the group direction whether it involves rioting, the
use of drugs or any other type of extreme behavior."
Does this
sound like what has been happening in American society over the
past several decades? (Or
The NEA publication ISSUES IN
(HUMAN RELATIONS) TRAINING
mentioned above also includes information about "change-agent
skills" and "unfreezing, changing and refreezing" attitudes. As
I related in Part 4 of this series on mental health, education
and social control, NEA president Catherine Barrett in the
February 10, 1973 edition of SATURDAY REVIEW OF EDUCATION
declared:
"Dramatic changes in the way we raise our children in
the year 2000 are indicated, particularly in terms of
schooling....We will need to recognize that the so-called 'basic
skills,' which currently represent nearly the total effort in
elementary schools, will be taught in one-quarter of the present
school day....When this happens---and it's near---the teacher
can rise to his true calling. More than a dispenser of
information, the teacher will be a conveyor of values, a
philosopher....We will be agents of change."
Thus, NEA "change
agents" were determined to be conveyors of a new set of values
to students. And how would they accomplish their goals?
After
students' values were unfrozen via a values clarification
process destroying the concept of moral absolutes, the students'
values were then changed via sensitivity training to accept
"common values" (those values we all have in common), which were
then refrozen via reinforcement mechanisms
like Pavlov's dogs.
In the future,
those disagreeing with the need for "common
values" will be labeled as in need of mental health services,
because they will be identified as having "oppositional deficit
disorder." According to the DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF
MENTAL DISORDERS (found in social service agencies, schools,
etc.) code 313.81 DSM IV, "oppositional deficit disorder"
includes arguing with adults (e.g., teachers), acting angry,
refusing to obey (e.g., teachers), annoying other people, or
blaming others for misbehavior.
Thus, you can see how easy it is to identify someone as having a
mental disorder and in need of mental health services. [What
Christian's need today is freedom to
avoid the mental manipulations of today's educational hierarchy]
And the changing of values is not just limited to students, as
the NTL Institute of Applied Behavioral Science (which was the
NEA division that produced ISSUES IN HUMAN RELATIONS TRAINING)
on September 19-22, 2004 co-sponsored the Second International
Conference on Appreciative Inquiry (for "bold innovators who
want to harness the power of positive change in their
organizations"), including a Roundtable session on "Creating a
Collaborative Community-Based Solution for Mental Health."
NTL
describes itself as "the premier source for transformational
change," and their program registration form requests
participants to sign a statement that "I understand that my
participation in this NTL program may involve considerable
stress." In fact, they have stated: "Persons who are
experiencing personal, emotional crises should forego attendance
at NTL programs."
President Bush's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (NFCMH)
had appointed subcommittees, one of which on February 5, 2003
issued a report titled, "Promoting, Preserving and Restoring
Children's Mental Health." Concerning the broadening of the
definition of "mental health," the report stated:
"Federal and
state governments should promote a broader concept of 'mental
health' services for children and adolescents with emotional
disorders and their families."
To give a sense of urgency, the
report said: "Mental health problems among children and
adolescents constitute a public health crisis for our
nation....The extent, severity, and far-reaching consequences of
mental health problems in children and adolescents make it
imperative that our nation adopt a comprehensive, systematic,
public health approach to improving the mental health status of
children."
The subcommittee report recommended
screening of children from
birth to five years old for social and emotional development.
And to be sure lots of taxpayers' dollars are available, it
recommended a plan for Medicaid to pay for services. This is
especially important for the drug companies, as antidepressant
and antipsychotic drugs can be very expensive. In a press
release on July 22, 2003 the NFCMH recommended redesigning
mental health systems in all states, and said:
"Achieving this
goal will require...a greater focus on mental health care in
institutions such as schools, child welfare programs, and the
criminal and juvenile justice systems. The goal is integrated
care that can screen, identify, and respond to problems early."
The rate of increase in prescribed drugs for children has also
been alarming. According to Erica Goode's "Sharp Rise Found in
Psychiatric Drugs for the Very Young" (THE NEW YORK TIMES,
February 23, 2000), a recent study found that
"the use of
stimulants---most commonly methylphenidate, the generic form of
Ritalin---increased twofold to threefold for children ages 2
through 4 from 1991 to 1995....
"Dr. Joseph Coyle, chairman of
psychiatry at Harvard Medical School, commented, the normal
behavior of many 2-year-olds and 3-year-olds looks a lot like
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 'These interventions
are occurring at a critical time in brain development,' said Dr.
Coyle, 'and we don't know what the consequences are.'"
The number of children on antidepressants increased by over 500%
from 1999 to 2003. There were over 7 million prescriptions
written for Eli Lilly's Zyprexa in 2002, and THE NEW YORK TIMES
reported that 70% of Zyprexa purchased in the U.S. in 2003 were
paid for by Medicaid and other federal programs. You may recall
that after George H.W. Bush left the CIA in 1977, he joined Eli
Lilly's board of directors.
For ONLINE JOURNAL, Evelyn Pringle wrote
"Drug makers to profit
from Bush scheme to label kids mentally ill" (March 15, 2005),
for which she interviewed Dr. Jane Orient, executive director of
the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS),
about "this latest profiteering scheme." Dr. Orient commented:
"Teams of experts are awaiting an infusion of cash.
They'll be
ensconced in your child's school before you even know it. A
bonus is that your little darlings will probably give them quite
a lot of information about you also, and then you can receive
therapy you didn't know you needed."
Dr. Orient further
explained that children will be asked if their parents "ever
spank them? Have politically incorrect attitudes? Use forbidden
words? Own a gun? Smoke cigarettes, especially indoors? Read
extremist literature? Refuse to recycle? Prepare for a knock at
the door."
Pringle added that "According to the University of
Wisconsin-Whitewater Student Health Center, privacy rights are
essentially being ignored. The center is telling patients that
if government agencies want to see their medical records, they
get to review them without a patient's knowledge or consent. 'By
law we cannot reveal when we have disclosed such information to
the government,' the center advised."
In a more recent article, "Bush Puppets Push For New Law To
Protect Drug Companies" (INDEPENDENT MEDIA TV, April 18, 2005),
Pringle described the dangers associated with the
antidepressants so many students are taking. She noted that one
of the Columbine killers, Eric Harris, had been taking Luvox,
which lists adverse reactions as: "FREQUENT: amnesia, apathy,
hyperkinesis, hypokinesis, manic reaction, myoclonus, psychotic
reaction."
She also noted that Jeff Weise, who recently killed 9
persons and himself in Red Lake, MN, was taking Prozac.
Moreover, Pringle wrote that "in addition to SSRI (selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors) antidepressants being dangerous,
these expensive drugs are a rip-off because studies have shown
they do not even work on children. The August 10, 2004
WASHINGTON POST reported,
"Two-thirds of the trials conducted by
drug manufacturers found that the medications performed no
better than sugar pills, but details of the negative trials were
kept from doctors and parents.'"
The alternative to drugs, psychotherapy, is no better either.
The best-known early research on this was by Hans J. Eysenck,
who in "Psychotherapy, Behavior Therapy, and the Outcome
Problem," British Medical Association (BMA) Audio Cassette/T-308
(New York: Guilford Publications, 1979), found that after
examining 8000 cases, "roughly two-thirds of a group of neurotic
patients will recover or improve to a marked extent within about
2 years of the onset of their illness, whether they are treated
by means of psychotherapy or not."
Moreover, in PSYCHOTHERAPY
RESEARCH: METHODOLOGICAL AND EFFICACY ISSUES (1982) by the
American Psychiatric Association Commission on Psychotherapies,
one reads that "unequivocal conclusions about causal connections
between treatment and outcome may never be possible in psychotheraphy research."
This section was
moved down here from the top of this page by Berit Kjos.
As Prof. Robert A. Pastor wrote in the
January-February 2004 edition of the Council on Foreign
Relations' FOREIGN AFFAIRS, "NAFTA was merely the first draft of
an economic constitution for North America."
The one-world
government will also be feudalistic in nature, as Arthur S.
Miller in DEMOCRATIC DICTATORSHIP: THE EMERGENT CONSTITUTION OF
CONTROL (1981) described a "new feudal order" controlled by
elitists. Miller also assessed that "dictatorship will come---is
coming---but with the acquiescence of the people, who
subconsciously probably want it. The Grand Inquisitor likely was
correct: People want material plenty and mysticism, not perfect
freedom. Freedom is an intolerable burden....The ideologist for
the development is B.F. Skinner. The goal is 'predictable'
man---a person who conceives of freedom in Hegelian terms.
Americans are moving into a Skinnerian world, one in which they
'will no longer know, or care, whether they are volunteers or
conscripts. The distinctions will have vanished' (Peter Schrag,
MIND CONTROL, 1978)."
Miller followed this work with SECRET CONSTITUTION AND THE NEED
FOR CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE (1987), expressing thanks to the
Rockefeller Foundation for their help. In this book, Miller
declared that "a pervasive system of thought control exists in
the United States....
The citizenry is indoctrinated by
employment of the mass media and the system of public
education,...people are told what to think about....The old
order is crumbling....Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous
social disease....A new vision is required to plan and manage
the future, a global vision that will transcend national
boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic
'solutions.'
A new constitution is necessary....Americans
really have no choice, for constitutional alteration will come
whether or not it is liked or planned for....Ours is the age of
the planned society....No other way is possible."
© 2005 Dennis Cuddy - All Rights Reserved
Order Dennis Cuddy's new book "Cover-Up: Government Spin or
Truth?"
Sign Up For Free E-Mail Alerts
E-Mails are used strictly for NWVs alerts, not for sale
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr.
Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received
a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
(major in American History, minor in political science). Dr.
Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political
and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm,
and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of
Education.
Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of
the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited
twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles
appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The
Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a
guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the
country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also
been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and
CBS's Nightwatch.