"In alerting criminal investigators, Specialist Darby, a
24-year-old from Maryland, stood out from other soldiers who learned of
the abuse.... Many other people including medics, dog handlers and
military intelligence soldiers -- and even the warden of the site where
the abuses occurred -- saw or heard of similar pictures of abuse,
witnessed it or heard abuse discussed openly at Abu Ghraib....
Mistreatment was not only widely known but also apparently tolerated, so
much so that a picture of naked detainees forced into a human pyramid
was used as a screen saver on a computer in the interrogations room."[1]
Kate Zernike
"You shall not follow a crowd to do evil...."
Exodus 23:2
Who is to blame for the huge explosion of
sexually transmitted diseases among teens? Is it the
contraceptive-pushing crowd or the abstinence-only crowd?
On March 30, 2004, Robert Rector, who is
considered to be the "father of welfare reform," wrote:
Fact: Government spends $12 to
promote contraceptives for every $1 spent on abstinence. In 2002,
the federal and state governments spent an estimated $1.73 billion
on a wide variety of contraception-promotion and
pregnancy-prevention programs. More than a third of that money ($653
million) was spent specifically to fund contraceptive programs for
teens. In contrast, programs teaching teens to abstain from sexual
activity received only an estimated $144.1 million in the same year.
Overall, government spent $12.00 to promote contraception for every
one dollar spent to encourage abstinence. If funding for teens alone
is examined, government still spent $4.50 on promoting teen
contraceptive use for every one dollar spent on teen abstinence.
As reported on 24 Aug 2006 by Sharon
Quick, MD, FCP, FAAP
Washington State Coordinator, American Academy of Medical Ethics,
" In Washington state, in the seven years following the start of the
pharmacist direct pilot project for dispensing emergency
contraception, chlamydia infection rates rose from 169.8 to 285.9
cases per 100,000, with teenage women showing a 36% increase
(l997-2004)."
On Nov. 8, 2007, The Lancet
reported, "birth control pills increase the chance that a woman will
develop cervical cancer and other cancers of the womb and
that taking birth control pills for five years doubles the chance
that a woman will get cervical cancer." This means that if teens
begin taking birth-control pills while the teens are very young
girls, the chances of their developing cervical cancers increase
exponentially.
In November 2005, Senator Tom Coburn, a
physician, stated that a meta-analysis published in the journal of
Sexually Transmitted Diseases in 2002 concluded, "there was no
consistent evidence of a protective effect of condom use on HPV DNA
detection, and in some studies condom use was associated with a
slightly increased risk for these lesions."
Reported on 11.13.07 by AP Medical Writer
Mike Stobbe:
...more than 1 million cases of
chlamydia were reported in the United States last year — the most
ever reported for a sexually transmitted disease, federal health
officials said Tuesday. Gonorrhea rates are jumping again after
hitting a record low, and an increasing number of cases are caused
by a 'superbug' version resistant to common antibiotics, federal
officials said Tuesday. Syphilis is rising, too. The rate of
congenital syphilis — which can deform or kill babies — rose for the
first time in 15 years...Chlamydia is the most common. Nearly
1,031,000 cases were reported last year, up from 976,000 the year
before. The count broke the single-year record for reported cases
of a sexually transmitted disease, which was 1,013,436 cases of
gonorrhea, set in 1978.
Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report on 8.14.07
stated:
According to the Centers for Disease
Control, homosexuals [men who have sex with men -- MSM] accounted
for 7% of syphilis cases in the country but accounted for more than
60% in 2005...According to officials with the CDC, the increase
could be fueled by MSM who also have sex with women
[bisexual]...people with syphilis are two to five times more likely
to contract HIV because of open sores caused by the infection.
The American Journal of Public Health
(10.2105/AJPH.2005.074062), April 26, 2007, reported, "Notably, the
study also found that infection rates were 4 times higher among those
who used condoms during their last vaginal intercourse.”
The New England Journal of Medicine reported
in May 2007 that 100 women who were diagnosed with cancers at the back
of the throat definitely contracted oral HPV from having oral sex, and
they concluded that this is being spread because of the widespread oral
sexual practices among adolescents. The Houston Chronicle on 5.12.07
went on to say, "The study found that people who have had more than five
oral-sex partners in their lifetime are 250 percent more likely to
develop throat cancer than those who do not have oral sex."
On Sept. 13, 2007, under a Freedom of
Information Act, Judicial Watch was able to obtain records from the
maker of the HPV vaccine, Gardasil, which showed that there have
been 3,461 adverse reactions including eleven deaths since FDA approval.
On 1.11.07 USA Today reported that the
drug-resistant Superbug called MRSA "is transmitted by direct
skin-to-skin contact, so it's not surprising it could be transmitted
during sex...Scientists at Columbia University Medical Center, reporting
in the Feb. 1 issue of Clinical Infectious Diseases, identified three
cases in which the bacteria known as community-associated MRSA passed
between sexual partners."
On 6.27.06, LifeSiteNews.com reported:
A new study on condom effectiveness in
protecting against the cancer-causing human papilloma virus has
shown a discrediting 30% [28.5%] failure rate...The study relied on
the journals of 82 female university students who kept daily records
of their sexual behaviour...the study reports that 12 out of 42
women whose partners always used condoms did get HPV. Thus, 28.5% of
the women got HPV even with 100% condom use...Who would consider
this an acceptable failure rate when dealing with a cancer-causing
virus?
Congress is presently fighting over the $141
Million which is the proposed FY2008 funding for Community Based
Abstinence Education (CBAE) programs. CBAE programs help communities
all across the U. S. to deliver the message that abstinence is the
surest way to avoid out-of-wedlock pregnancy and sexually transmitted
diseases.
Title V is one of three federally-funded
abstinence education programs. Title V provides $50 million annually in
state grants to teach students the benefits of abstinence until marriage
and that abstinence outside marriage is the expected norm for school-age
children.
Reinventing the
World, Parts 1 & 2 |
Molding Human Resources for a Global Workforce
An analysis of Community Oriented Policing |
Brainwashing in America