Smart Grid: The Implementation of Technocracy?
By Patrick Wood (www.augustreview.com)
Introduction
According to the
United Nations Governing Council of the UN Environmental Programme(UNEP),
"our dominant economic model may thus be termed a 'brown economy." UNEP'sclearly stated goal is to overturn the "brown economy" and replace it with a "green economy."
"A green economy implies the decoupling of resource use and environmental impacts
from economic growth... These investments, both public and private, provide
the mechanism for the reconfiguration of businesses, infrastructure and institutions,
and for the adoption of sustainable consumption and production processes."
[p. 2]Sustainable consumption? Reconfiguring businesses, infrastructure and institutions? What do
these words mean? They do not mean merely reshuffling the existing order, but rather replacing
it with a completely new economic system, one that has never before been seen or used in the
history of the world.
This paper will demonstrate that the current crisis of capitalism is being used to implement a
radical new economic system that will completely supplant it. This is not some new idea created
in the bowels of the United Nations: It is a revitalized implementation of Technocracy that was
thoroughly repudiated by the American public in 1933, in the middle of the Great Depression.
The Technocrats have resurfaced, and they do not intend to fail a second time. Whether or not
they succeed this time will depend upon the intended servants of Technocracy, the citizens of the
world.
Indeed, the dark horse of the New World Order is not Communism, Socialism or Fascism. It is
Technocracy.
Background
Founded by Howard Scott and M. King Hubbert in 1932 during the Great Depression, Technocracy
proposed a radical new solution for the world's economic ills. In 1932, Harry A. Porter
wrote in
Roosevelt and Technocracy,“Just as the Reformation established Religious Freedom, just as the Declaration
of Independence brought about our Political Freedom, Technocracy promises Economic
Freedom."
[Foreward, iii]Porter's plan included abandoning the gold standard, suspending the stock exchanges and nationalizing
railroads and public utilities. Freedom notwithstanding, Porter then called for
President-elect Franklin D. Roosevelt to be sworn in as Dictator rather than President so that he
could overturn the existing economic system in favor of Technocracy: "Drastic as these changes
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 13
from the present order of things may be, they will serve their purpose if only to pave the way for
the Economic Revolution - and Technocracy."
(p. 63)If Technocracy had truly been extinguished before the onset of WWII, we would not be concerned
about it today. However, when Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote
Between Two Ages: America'sRole in the Technetronic Era in 1968, it was essentially a Neo-Technocratic treatise calling for a
fourth and final stage of world history, or the Technetronic Era.
When David Rockefeller picked Brzezinski to co-found the Trilateral Commission in 1973, it
was with the specific goal to create a "New International Economic Order." Without some
knowledge of historic Technocracy, exactly what the Trilateral Commission ultimately had in
mind with such a goal could not possibly have been understood.
Today, it is necessary to rethink these issues in order to determine a) if this radical movement is
still operating, b) what are their goals and c) how do they plan to achieve their goals.
In
Carbon Currency: A New Beginning for Technocracy?, the subject of historic Technocracywas introduced in the context of creating a new economic system based on energy accounting
rather than price accounting. An energy-based accounting system uses "energy certificates," or
Carbon Currency, instead of dollars or other fiat currencies. Periodic and equal allocations of
available energy are made to citizens, but they must be used within the defined time period before
they reach an expiration date. Furthermore, the ability to own private property and accumulate
wealth would be deemed unnecessary.
The pressing and unanswered question is how would such a Technocratic system actually be
implemented?
This paper will now address the strategy, tactical requirements and progress of establishing an
energy-based Technate in North America. ["Technate" is the term used to describe the geographic
region operated according to Technocracy. Thus, a North American Technate would include Canada,
Mexico and the U.S. and they would all be under common control.]
Requirements
The
Technocracy Study Course, written by Howard Scott and M. King Hubbert in 1932, establisheda detailed framework for Technocracy in terms of energy production, distribution and usage.
According to Scott and Hubbert, the distribution of energy resources must be monitored and
measured in order for the system to work -- and this is the key:
monitoring and measuring.They wrote that the system must do the following things:
1.
"Register on a continuous 24 hour-per-day basis the total net conversion of energy.
2.
"By means of the registration of energy converted and consumed, make possible a balanced
load.
3.
"Provide a continuous inventory of all production and consumption
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 14
4.
"Provide a specific registration of the type, kind, etc., of all goods and services, where
produced and where used
5.
"Provide specific registration of the consumption of each individual, plus a record and
description of the individual."
[Scott, Howard et al, Technocracy Study Source, p. 232]In 1932, such technology did not exist. Time was on the Technocrat's side, however, because
this technology
does exist today, and it is being rapidly implemented to do exactly what Scottand Hubbert specified: Namely, to exhaustively monitor, measure and control every kilowatt of
energy delivered to consumers and businesses on a system-wide basis.
It's called:
Smart Grid.What is Smart Grid?
Smart Grid is a broad technical term that encompasses the generation, distribution and consumption
of electrical power, with an inclusion for gas and water as well. America's aging power
grid is increasingly fragile and inefficient. Smart Grid is an initiative that seeks to completely
redesign the power grid using advanced digital technology, including the installation of new,
digital meters on every home and business in the U.S.
These digital meters provide around-the-clock monitoring of a consumer's energy consumption
using continuous 2-way communication between the utility and the consumer's property. Furthermore,
meters will be able to communicate with electrical devices
within the residence togather consumption data and to control certain devices directly without consumer intervention.
According to a U.S. Department of Energy publication,
"The Department of Energy has been charged with orchestrating the wholesale
modernization of our nation's electrical grid... Heading this effort is the Office of
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. In concert with its cutting edge research
and energy policy programs, the office’s newly formed, multi-agency Smart Grid
Task Force is responsible for coordinating standards development, guiding research
and development projects, and reconciling the agendas of a wide range of stakeholders."
(See
The Smart Grid: An Introduction)This is a relatively new initiative, but it is racing forward at breakneck speed. The Office of
Electricity Delivery was created in 2003 under President George W. Bush, and elevated in stature
in 2007 by creating the position of Assistant Secretary of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability
to head it.
It is not clearly stated who "charged" the Department of Energy to this task, but since the Secretary
of Energy answers directly to the President, it is assumed that it was a directive from the
President. There certainly was no Congressional directive or mandate.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 15
Implementation
On October 27, 2009, the Obama administration unveiled its Smart Grid plan by awarding $3.4
billion awarded to
100 Smart Grid projects. According to the Department of Energy's press release,these awards will result in the installation of:
•
more than 850 sensors called 'Phasor Measurement Units" to monitor the overall power
grid nationwide
•
200,000 smart transformers
•
700 automated substations (about 5 percent of the nation's total)
•
1,000,000 in-home displays
•
345,000 load control devices in homes
This is the "kick-start" of Smart Grid in the U.S. On January 8, 2010, President Obama unveiled
an additional $2.3 billion Federal funding program for the "energy manufacturing sector"
as part of the $787 billion American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. Funding had already been
awarded to 183 projects in 43 states, pending Obama's announcement.
One such project in the northwest is headed by Battelle Memorial Institute, covering five states
and targeting 60,000 customers. The project was actually developed by the Bonneville Power
Administration (BPA), a federal agency underneath the Department of Energy. Since it is pointedly
illegal for a federal agency to apply for federal funds, BPA passed the project off to Battelle,
a non-profit and non-governmental organization (NGO), which was promptly awarded $178 million.
It is interesting to note that BPA takes credit for originating the Smart Grid concept in the early
1990's, which it termed "Energy Web." You can see from BPA's graphic depiction that it is comprehensive
in scope from production to consumption.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 16
According to
Battelle's August 27, 2009 press release,"The project will involve more than 60,000 metered customers in Idaho, Montana,
Oregon, Washington and Wyoming. Using smart grid technologies, the project will
engage system assets exceeding 112 megawatts, the equivalent of power to serve
86,000 households.
'The proposed demonstration will study smart grid benefits at unprecedented geographic
breadth across five states, spanning the electrical system from generation
to end-use, and containing many key functions of the future smart grid,' said Mike
Davis, a Battelle vice president. 'The intended impact of this project will span well
beyond traditional utility service territory boundaries, helping to enable a future
grid that meets pressing local, regional and national needs’.”
Battelle and BPA intend to work closely together and there is an obvious blurring as to who is
really in control of the project's management during the test period.
In a "For Internal Use Only" document written in August 2009, BPA offers talking points to its
partners. It states that "
Smart Grid technology includes everything from interactive appliances inhomes to smart meters, substation automation and sensors on transmission lines." [Emphasis
added]
A Network of Things
As the World Wide Web (WWW) is to people, the Network of Things (NOT) is to appliances.
This brand new technology creates a wireless network between a broad range of inanimate objects
from shoes to refrigerators. This concept is "shovel ready" for Smart Grid implementation
because appliances, meters and substations are all inanimate items that technocrats would have
communicating with each other.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 17
For instance, In 2008 the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) developed this small
circuit board called a "Grid Friendly Appliance Controller." According to a Department of Energy
brochure,
"The GFA Controller developed by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is a
small circuit board built into household appliances that reduces stress on the power
grid by continually monitoring fluctuations in available power. During times of high
demand, appliances equipped with the controller automatically shut down for a
short period of time, resulting in a cumulative reduction that can maintain stability
on the grid."
According to PNNL's website,
"The controller is essentially a simple computer chip that can be installed in regular
household appliances like dishwashers, clothes washers, dryers, refrigerators,
air conditioners, and water heaters. The chip senses when there is a disruption in
the grid and turns the appliances off for a few seconds or minutes to allow the grid
to stabilize. The controllers also can be programmed to delay the restart of the appliances.
The delay allows the appliances to be turned on one at a time rather than
all at once to ease power restoration following an outage."
You can see how automatic actions are intended to be triggered by direct interaction between
objects, without human intervention. The rules will be written by programmers under the direction
of technocrats who understand the system, and then downloaded to the controllers as necessary.
Thus, changes to the rules can be made on the fly, at any time and without the homeowner's
knowledge.
PNNL is not a private enterprise, however. It is "owned" by the U.S. Department of Energy and
operated by Battelle Memorial Institute!
All of this technology will be enabled with Wi-Fi circuitry that is identical to the Wi-Fi-enabled
network modems and routers commonly used in homes and businesses throughout the world. Wi-
Fi is a trademark of the Wi-Fi Alliance that refers to wireless network systems used in devices
from personal computers to mobile phones, connecting them together and/or to the Internet.
According to the Wi-Fi Alliance, "
the need for Smart Grid solutions is being driven by theemergence of distributed power generation and management/monitoring of consumption." In
their white paper, Wi-Fi for the Smart Grid, they list the specific requirements for interoperability
posted by the Department of Energy:
1.
Provide two-way communication among grid users, e.g. regional market operators, utilities,
service providers and consumers
2.
Allow power system operators to monitor their own systems as well as neighboring systems
that affect them so as to facilitate more reliable energy distribution and delivery
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 18
3.
Coordinate the integration into the power system of emerging technologies such as renewable
resources, demand response resources, electricity storage facilities and electric
transportation systems
4.
Ensure the cyber security of the grid.
Thus, the bi-directional and real time Smart Grid communications network will depend on Wi-
Fi from end to end. This is easily understood from the two figures included in the Wi-Fi Alliance
white paper:
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 19
While the consumer is pacified with the promise of lower utility costs, it is the utility company
who will enforce the policies set at the regional, national and global regulators. Thus, if a neighboring
system has a shortage of electricity, your thermostat might automatically be turned down
to compensate; if you have exceeded your monthly daytime quota of electricity, energyconsuming
tasks like washing and drying clothes, could be limited to overnight hours.
Smart Grid and the utility's control extends beyond electricity. Notice in Figure 1 above that
there is a Wi-Fi linkage to gas and water meters as well!
Consumer Blowback?
Wall Street Journal
reported "What Utilities Have Learned From Smart-Meter Tests..." on February22, 2010, and revealed several important early aspects of smart grid implementation.
•
A principal goal is to enable utilities to restructure rate plans
•
A principal goal is to force consumer behavior to change
•
Some utility executives anticipate and fear a consumer rebellion
Nevertheless, the big carrot for utility companies to go along with the government's Smart Grid
is to balance electrical demand, cut back on new power generation facilities and enhance their
profit picture.
Before the dust settles on Smart Grid, both consumers and utilities may learn some sharp lessons
about government intervention: When the government shows up on your doorstep and offers
to help you save money, everyone knows that is an oxymoron. Government does not function
to help people or companies to save money or to be more efficient; rather, it functions to
maintain and increase its own power and control over its citizens.
Going Global
The UNEP report mentioned above reveals that "
15 percent of the fiscal stimulus funds committedfor 2009-2010, which exceed $3.1 trillion, can be regarded as green in nature... most green
components are oriented towards energy efficiency and renewable energies in a variety of sectors.
"A BusinessWeek article, "How Italy Beat the World to a Smarter Grid" stated on November 16,
2009 that "After several false starts, 2010 finally could be the year when smart meters go
global."
Indeed, it is:
•
Italy has already implemented Smart Grid technology in 85 percent of its homes nationwide
•
Earth2tech.com
reports that Smart Grid will generate $200 billion of global investment inthe next few years
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 20
•
The
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) has laid out a global roadmap toinsure interoperability of Smart Grid systems between nations
•
Global companies are rushing to gain their share of the global Smart Grid market: IBM,
Siemens, GE, Cisco, Panasonic, Kyocera, Toshiba, Mitsubishi, etc.
•
China is spending $7.32 billion to build out Smart Grid in Asia.
Other countries with Smart Grid pilot projects already launched include Germany, France,
England, Russia, Japan, India, Australia, South Africa and a host of others. Regional organizations
such as
SMARTGRIDS Africa have been set up to promote Smart Grid in smaller countries.Thus, the global rush is on. In every case, Smart Grid is being accelerated by government
stimulus spending. The global vendors are merely lining up their money buckets to be filled up
with taxpayer funds.
As is the case in the U.S., there was little, if any, preexisting or latent demand for Smart Grid
technology. Demand has been artificially created by the respective governments of each country.
Conclusion
Smart Grid meets 100 percent of the Technocracy's original requirements as described above.
In other words, it will monitor and control both delivery and consumption of energy and other
green resources such as water and gas.
The Smart Grid initiative was developed and funded by government agencies and NGO's. It
was the Energy Department's Bonneville Power Authority that invented the concept in the
1990's. It was the Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory that invented
the Grid Friendly Appliance Controller. It was the Federal Administration that showered billions
of dollars over the private sector to jump-start the nationwide initiative to implement Smart Grid
in every community.
If the Federal government had not been the initial and persistent driver, would Smart Grid exist
at all? It is highly doubtful.
Following the same pattern as the U.S., many other industrialized nations are implementing
Smart Grid at the same time, using their own stimulus money. This synchronized implementation
is certainly by design, and as such, it implies that there must be a designer.
Who might be providingsuch top-down coordination on a global basis must be saved for another paper. One thing is
certain: The technology being purchased world-wide all originated in the United States and is
being marketed by the same global corporations as mentioned above.
Lastly, there is an assumption throughout Smart Grid literature that the Federal Administration
will have full visibility of all data within the Smart Grid, even down to the individual household.
They will also be in a position to set national, regional and local distribution and consumption
policies, such as your "fair share" of available energy, gas and water.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 21
International standards created for Smart Grid will also enable the U.S. Smart Grid to be connected
seamlessly with Canada and Mexico, thus providing a comprehensive North American
energy management and distribution system.
Is Smart Grid destined to be a global phenomenon? Yes. Is it designed to support a new global
Technocratic, resource-based economic system? Yes.
Technocracy must be seen for what it is: An attempt to impose a totalitarian, scientific dictatorship.
In 1933, it called for the inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt as dictator in order to
"pave the way for economic revolution." Fortunately at the time, they failed in their attempted
coup.
If today's Smart Grid is successfully completed, it will enable the conversion of our existing
economic system into something far different and far worse. This is why the American people
repudiated Technocracy in 1933, and this is exactly why we (and citizens around the world)
should thoroughly repudiate it today.
Resources
Scott & Hubbert,
Technocracy Study Course, Technocracy, Inc., 1934Background paper for the ministerial consultations
, Governing Council of the United NationsEnvironmental Programme, December 14, 2009
The Smart Grid: An Introduction
, U.S. Department of EnergyPacific Northwest National Laboratory
, web site2010 Strategic Plan
, Office of Electricity Delivery & Energy ReliabilityThe Networked Grid 100: Movers and Shakers of the Smart Grid
Meloan, Steve, "
Toward a Global 'Internet of Things'", Oracle Software, November 11, 2003Wi-Fi for the Smart Grid
, Wi-Fi Alliance, 2009Obama Announces $3.4 Billion Investment to Spur Transition to Smart Energy Grid
, Departmentof Energy Press Release
Note: In preparing for this report, the editor would like to give special thanks to Dr. Martin Erdmann,
Carl Teichrib and Dr. Michael Coffman, for their encouragement, testing of ideas and additional
supporting research.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 22
Forcing Change
FC is a monthly, online publication dedicated to documenting and analyzing the socioreligious,
political and economic transformations now sweeping our Western world.
Forcing Change is a membership subscription service, with an annual fee of $54.95 US.
Membership in Forcing Change allows access to the full range of FC publications, including
special reports, audio and media presentations, FC back issues, expert documents,
and more. FC receives neither government funding nor the financial backing of
any other institutions; rather, FC operates solely on subscription/membership support.
To learn more about Forcing Change, including member benefits, go to
www.forcingchange.org.
Forcing Change
Box 31
Plumas, Manitoba
R0J-1P0
Reprint Permissions
For Publications: Permission to re-publish articles found in Forcing Change is granted,
provided that FC credit is acknowledged (preferably with the Forcing Change URL attached),
and that Forcing Change is notified of the article use.
For Private Use: Permission is granted for individuals to make copies of FC articles and
distribute to family, friends, colleagues and community leaders.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 8
August 2010
PAGE 23
The Great Technological War
It’s hard for us, almost one hundred years after the fact, to comprehend the cultural shock that came with the Great War – better known to us as World War I. Science and technology had promised a horn of plenty and human unity, yet it unleashed indescribable horrors.
In August 1914 the might of modern industry, science, and engineering baptized Europe in fire, steel, and blood. In terrible irony the opening battles witnessed French infantrymen marching across fields in “blue breaches and red coats,” and artillery officers in bold black and gold dress (47) – throwbacks to a Napoleonic age. The Great War for the French (and others) started with its foot in the romantic past. But this was the era of science and mechanization; World War I was the first engineered slaughterhouse....
Endnotes:
1. Graham A. Laing, Towards Technocracy (The Angelus Press, 1933), p.46.
2. Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood’s End (Ballantine Books, 1953), p.69.
3. Scott Nearing, United World (Island Press, 1944), p.221.
4. David F. Victor and Joshua C. House, “A New Currency: Climate Change and Carbon Credits,”
HarvardInternational Review
, Summer 2004, p.56.5. A Rough Guide to Individual Carbon Trading (Centre for Sustainable Energy, November 2006), p.13.
6. A very interesting book on technology’s role in cultural change is
Technopoly: The Surrender of Cultureto Technology
, by Neil Postman (Vintage, 1993).7. Neil Postman, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology (Vintage, 1993), p.11.
8. From the 1936 movie, Things To Come.
9. Henry C. Clausen, Emergence of the Mystical (Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry,
1981), p.xi.
10. Henry C. Clausen, Emergence of the Mystical, p.92.
11. See the H.G. Wells’ listing in the webpage for the Grand Lodge of British Columbia and Yukon
(www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/wells_h/wells_h.html).
12. H.G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution (Doubleday, Doran and Company,
1928), p.143.
13. Wells, The Open Conspiracy, p.163.
14. As quoted in Vance Packard’s book, The People Shapers (Little, Brown and Company, 1977), p.3.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 7
July 2010
PAGE 16
15. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx: Modern Western Political Thought (University of Chicago
Press, 1972), p.273.
16. “Auguste Comte,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/comte
17. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.273.
18. Felix Markham, introduction to Henri de Saint-Simon’s collection,
Social Organization, The Scienceof Man, and Other Writings
(Harper, 1952), p.xxi.19. Henri de Saint-Simon, “Introduction to the Scientific Studies of the 19th Century,”
Social Organization,The Science of Man and Other Writings
(Harper, 1952), p.20.20. Henri de Saint-Simon, “Essay on the Science of Man,”
Social Organization, The Science of Man andOther Writings
(Harper, 1952), p.21.21. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.296.
22. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.290.
23. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.289.
24. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.296.
25. Dante Germino, Machiavelli to Marx, p.296.
26. W.H.G. Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1965),
p.298.
27. W.H.G. Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History, p.120.
28. For a Christian perspective, see Ken Ham and A. Charles Ware,
Darwin’s Plantation: Evolution’s RacistRoots
(Master Books, 2007). An older text worth perusing is Richard Hofstadter, Social Darwinism inAmerican Thought
(George Braziller, 1959). See also, Edwin Black, War Against The Weak (Four WallsEight Windows, 2003), and page 208 of Ronald W. Clark’s book,
The Survival of Charles Darwin: A Biographyof a Man and an Idea
(Random House, 1984). Finally, Benjamin Kidd discusses class and evolutionin his book, The Science of Power (Methuen, 1918/1919).
29. Quoted by Benjamin Kidd, The Science of Power (Methuen, 1918/1919), p.92.
30. A number of important books on the subject of eugenics have been published. I would suggest Edwin
Black’s War Against the Weak (Four Walls Eight Windows Publishing, 2003) for its thoroughness in regards
to American and Germanic eugenics.
31. Benjamin Kidd, The Science of Power (Methuen, 1918/19), pp.73-74.
32. Harold Loeb, Life In A Technocracy: What It Might Be Like (Syracuse University, 1933/1996), p.178.
33. Harold Loeb, Life In A Technocracy, p.174.
34. John L. Reed,
The Newest Whore of Babylon: The Emergence of Technocracy – A Study in theMechanization of Man
(Branden Press, 1975), p.120.35. B.F. Skinner, Walden Two (Macmillan, 1968 paperback edition), p.308.
36. David Lindsay,
Madness in the Making: The Triumphant Rise and Untimely Fall of America’s ShowInventors
(Kodansha, 1997), p.269.37. W.H.G. Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History, p.246.
38.W.H.G. Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats, p.249. See also pages 120-121.
39. For a detailed exploration of these events, see Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats: A Social History,
pp.202-358.
40. See, Don K. Rowney,
Transition to Technocracy: The Structural Origins of the Soviet AdministrativeState
(Cornell University Press, 1989). See also, W.H.G. Armytage, The Rise of the Technocrats: A SocialHistory
.41. Norman Dodd, The Dodd Report to the Reece Committee on Foundations, 1954. This short report can
be read over a cup of coffee, however, the Reece Committee hearings and final reports are very substantial
documents, exploring in detail the rise and influence of foundations as agents for international and
domestic social transformation.
42. Robert M. Gates, as explained in a speech he gave to the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace, Washington D.C, October 28, 2008.
43. Hendrik C. Andersen, World-Conscience: An International Society for the Creation of a World-Centre
(1913), p.4.
Forcing Change, Volume 4, Issue 7
July 2010
PAGE 17
44. Andersen,
World-Conscience: An International Societyfor the Creation of a World-Centre,
p.845. Andersen,
World-Conscience: An International Societyfor the Creation of a World-Centre,
p.11.46. Andersen,
World-Conscience: An International Societyfor the Creation of a World-Centre,
p.11.55. Benjamin Kidd, The Science of Power, p.12.
56. Kidd, The Science of Power, p.9.