|
|
Global War on Christian
Values - Part
3
(see also Part 1, Part 2) By Berit Kjos - June 21, 2010 Background information: Rockefeller and the Global Media Censors |
Emphasis added |
|
|
Global War on Christian
Values - Part
3
(see also Part 1, Part 2) By Berit Kjos - June 21, 2010 Background information: Rockefeller and the Global Media Censors |
Emphasis added |
"'A handful of us determine what will be on the evening news broadcasts, or, for that matter, in the New York Times or Washington Post or Wall Street Journal.... And those [news stories] available to us already have been culled and re-culled by persons far outside our control.'"[1] Walter Cronkite
"The effort to destroy the Jewish state has many fronts. One front is in Iran.... Another is in Gaza.... And this front thrives for only one reason — the complicity of the world press..."[2] Theater of War
"A new U.S. Senate bill would grant the president far-reaching emergency powers to seize control of or even shut down portions of the Internet."[3] Granting president emergency Internet power
"Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to...consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."[4] Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
The mainstream media presents a strange paradox. It highlights anti-Christian sentiments and minimizes Muslim violence. It fuels global rage against Israel for defending its tiny land (as did the front cover of the June 3rd Economist) but praises Islam as a "religion of peace." Why?
One reason is simply the Obama administration's new media policies. According to UPI,
"A Washington decision to strike terms linking the religion of Islam to extremism is a welcome departure to U.S. policy.... Influential clerics and other Muslim advocates have recommended avoiding words like 'jihad' and other Islamic terms for fear of undermining the peaceful nature of the religion."[5]
History offers another clue. Both Hitler and Stalin built far-reaching propaganda systems that would broadcast false promises and mandatory rules for political correctness. Both were determined to shift the focus of public rage away from their own devious agenda to a hateful image of a 'single adversary.'
Stalin's collective label for his foe was the bourgeoisie (or "exploiter") -- the enterprising middle class that owned property and resisted tyranny. Jews and Christians were obvious targets.
Hitler aimed his propaganda at a similar enemy -- mainly Jews. In a time of economic collapse, unemployment, envy, and political change, they served his purpose well. As he wrote in Mein Kampf,
"The art of all truly great national leaders at all times consists...primarily in not dividing the attention of a people, but in concentrating it upon a single foe.... It belongs to the genius of a great leader to make even adversaries far removed from one another seem to belong to a single category..."[6]
Hitler had studied the Bolshevik Revolution and had learned his lessons well. According the Encyclopaedia Britannica,
"It was a stroke of genius on the part of Hitler to find this common denominator in the Jew....This enabled him to discover the Jew behind all his changing adversaries... in short, behind everybody and everything that at a given moment opposed his wishes or aroused his wrath."[7]
Eventually, all Jews in the expanding Third Reich were marked for death. Christians who defied Nazi rules and practices usually faced the same end: concentration camps and death. As Jesus warned His disciples,
"...you will be hated by all nations for My name’s sake." (Matthew 24:9)
Media-Made Enemies
Islamic terrorism may be today's most obvious threat to a free America, but Mr. Obama and his team of change agents have found their "single adversary" in the medley of "malcontents" labeled "rightwing extremists." Like Hitler's Jews, this diverse mix represents both a "convenient" foe and an intolerable obstacle that must be purged in the name of unity.
So, "who's the Enemy in the War on Terror?" asked Joseph Lieberman. Then he explains:
"...the Obama administration rightly reaffirms that America remains a nation at war. Unfortunately, it refuses to identify our enemy in this war as what it is: violent Islamist extremism.
"...the first rule in war is to know your enemy so you can defeat it. The 2006 National Security Strategy did this: It correctly identified our enemy as 'the transnational terrorists [who] exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision.' The Obama administration removed those accurate and important words."[8]
Nor does the media expose a more subtle threat to freedom: the socialist ideology that is fast eroding America's laws, economy, schools and churches. Hungarian author Balint Vazsonyi described this battle in America's 30 Years War:
"A particularly important place in the political matrix was assigned to those considered to be enemies of the regime. Whereas democracies associate the word 'enemy' with a physical attack on their territory or the threat thereof, national socialism [Nazism] and communism require the existence of enemies—internal and external—at all times.
"The selection of internal enemies (Jews in Germany, 'exploiters' in Russia) would suggest a difference between the two regimes. But the Russians had anti-Jewish pogroms long before Hitler...
"And the Church, again, was looked upon by both as an enemy for the obvious reason that it, too, required allegiance and obedience—an attitude reserved exclusively to the party...
"...examination of nazism and bolshevism’s external enemies proved the most revealing. As discussed, the primary enemy in the eyes of both nazis and communists was... the English-speaking world [back then, it pointed to those who loved freedom].... As countries switched from nazi occupation to Soviet occupation, it was not unusual for the same henchmen to jail the same persons for the same offense: listening to an English-language broadcast."[9]
Who, then, are today's media-made "enemies of the People"?
Those who love America! Those who thank God for this land of freedom and opportunity! Those who recognize the corrupting effects of immorality and lawlessness! Those who stand firm on God's promises!
But allegiance to God doesn't fit the new vision of globalism and communitarian oneness! So it's not surprising that our Department of Homeland Security has prepared an Orwellian list of America's "enemies." Notice its subtle suggestions that faithful Christians who oppose abortion and lawlessness would be included:
"Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority.... It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or [illegal] immigration."[10]
No wonder our government passed a "Hate Crimes law" designed to silence those who might offend others by their commitment to God's moral values!
From Media Freedom to Government Control
